DECODING LANGUAGE: INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO TEACHING GRAMMAR AND VOCABULARY
Keywords:
retention, gamification, language acquisition, rote memorization, rule-based learning, metacognitive skills, cognitive psychology, contextualization, scaffolding, differentiation, passive instruction, decontextualized practice.Abstract
Language acquisition, particularly the mastery of grammar and vocabulary, is a fundamental aspect of effective communication and literacy. Traditional methods of teaching these elements have often been criticized for their lack of engagement and efficacy. This article explores innovative approaches to teaching grammar and vocabulary that aim to enhance comprehension, retention, and application. Drawing from interdisciplinary fields such as linguistics, cognitive psychology, and educational technology, these approaches leverage diverse strategies including gamification, multimedia resources, contextual learning, and adaptive technologies. By incorporating these innovative techniques into language instruction, educators can create dynamic learning environments that foster deeper understanding, creativity, and fluency in both spoken and written communication. This article examines the theoretical foundations, practical implementation strategies, and potential benefits of these innovative approaches, offering insights and recommendations for educators seeking to enhance language learning outcomes in diverse educational settings.
Downloads
References
Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). “The Grammar Book. An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course.”
Pinker, S. (1999). “Words and rules: The ingredients of language.”
McWhorter, J. H. (2001). “The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars.”
Nation, I.S.P. (2008). “Teaching Vocabulary: Strategies and Techniques.”
Thornbury, S. (1999). “How to Teach Grammar.”
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). “Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching.”
Ellis, R. (2006). “Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA Perspective.”
Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). “The Power of Feedback.”
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). “Learning vocabulary in another language.”
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). “Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom.”
Brown, H. D. (2007). “Principles of Language Learning and Teaching.”
Sailer et al., (2017). “How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction.”
Deterding et al., (2011). “From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining Gamification”
Reinders, H. & Wattana, S. (2014). “Can I say something? The effects of digital game play on willingness to communicate.”
Kern, R. (2006). “Perspectives on Technology in Learning and Teaching Languages.”
Levy, M. (2009). “Technologies in Use for Second Language Learning.”
Ellis, R. (2003). “Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching.”
Willis, J. (1996). “A Framework for Task-Based Learning.”
VanLehn, K. (2011). “The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems.”
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson R. T. (2014). “Cooperative Learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory.”
Benson, P. (2001). “Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning.”
Swain, M. (2000). “The Output Hypothesis and beyond: Mediating Acquisition through Collaborative Dialogue.”
Richards, J. C. & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). “Professional Development for Language Teachers.”
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). “The Theory and Practice of Technology in Materials Development and Task Design.”
Puentedura, R. R. (2014). “A contextualized introduction.”
Stockwell, G. (2015). “Technology and SLA: From multimodal communication to CALL.”
Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2016). “The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology.”
Benson, P. (2011). “Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning.”
Chapelle, C. A., & Sauro, S. (2017). “The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning.”
