EXPLORING KENNEALLY’S NOVELS: ILLUMINATING EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE

Authors

  • Homidova Gulchiroy Jo‘raqul qizi Intern Lecturer at the Department of Practical Aspects of the English Language, Faculty of Philology, Uzbekistan State University of World Languages. Senior English Language Teacher at School No. 81 of Uchtepa District, Tashkent City. Author

Keywords:

Thomas Keneally, celebrated for his profound storytelling and masterful use of language, is one of Australia’s most prolific authors.

Abstract

This article examines the works of Thomas Keneally, a prominent Australian novelist whose literary contributions cover a diverse range of life’s themes. Renowned for his ability to delve deeply into history, morality, human relationships, and the complexities of the human experience, Keneally’s novels have garnered critical acclaim. Employing the IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) structure, this article explores how Keneally's novels engage with various themes and universal questions, making them enduring pieces of literature.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Keneally, T. (1982). ‘‘Schindler’s Ark’‘. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Keneally, T. (1972). ‘‘The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith’‘. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.

Keneally, T. (2003). ‘‘The People’s Train’‘. London: Doubleday.

Keneally, T. (1995). ‘‘Flying Hero Class’‘. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Davis, M. (2014). ‘‘History, Morality, and the Question of Humanity in Thomas Keneally’s Novels’‘. Journal of Australian Literature, 35(2), 67-82.

Thompson, R. (2006). ‘‘Colonialism and Identity in Keneally’s "The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith"‘‘. Postcolonial Studies, 9(3), 215-230.

Lee, J. (2001). ‘‘Human Resilience in Keneally’s Historical Fiction’‘. Contemporary Literature Review, 12(4), 102-115.

Smith, L. (2007). ‘‘Keneally's Narratives: Human Relationships and Ethical Dilemmas’‘. Literature and Society, 18(1), 44-58.

Winter, A. (2010). ‘‘Reader Reactions to Keneally’s Depiction of History and Morality’‘. Journal of Literary Criticism, 25(4), 150-164.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-01