COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STYLISTIC DEVICES IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH LITERATURE
- Authors
-
-
Toshboyeva Umidaxon Bakhromjon kizi
Fergana State University, Faculty of foreign languages,student of Philology and teaching language (English language) umidaxontoshboyeva9@gmail.com +998908464185Author
-
- Abstract
-
This research investigates and contrasts the application of stylistic devices in the Uzbek and English languages. By examining selected literary works, the study uncovers both shared features and distinctive traits in the use of metaphors, similes, alliteration, and hyperbole. The results demonstrate that although both languages use such devices to enrich expression, their application is shaped by cultural and structural characteristics unique to each language.
- References
-
Qodiriy, A. (1925). O'tkan Kunlar. Tashkent: Uzbekistan Milliy Nashriyoti.
Vohidov, E. (2000). Tanlangan asarlar. Tashkent: G'afur G'ulom nomidagi Adabiyot va San'at nashriyoti.
Shakespeare, W. (1597). Romeo and Juliet. London: Thomas Creede.
Frost, R. (1916). Mountain Interval. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.
Karimov, K. (2010). O'zbek adabiyotida badiiy tasvir vositalari. Toshkent: O'qituvchi nashriyoti.
Leech, G. N., & Short, M. (2007). Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. Pearson Education.
Appendix
Table 1: Examples of Stylistic Devices in Uzbek and English Literature
| Stylistic Device | Uzbek Example | English Example | Function
| Metaphor | Yurak - g'am daryosi | All the world's a stage | Emotional depth, abstraction |
| Simile | Ko'zlaring oydek porlaydi | Her smile was as bright as the sun | Vivid imagery, comparison |
| Alliteration | Tingla tovushlar tiniq... | Peter Piper picked a... | Sound pattern, rhythm |
| Hyperbole | Ming yillik sog'inch | I'm so hungry I could eat a horse | Emphasis, exaggeration |
- Downloads
- Published
- 2025-05-29
- Section
- Articles