THE ROLE OF ORGANIC AND CONVENTIONAL LIVESTOCK FARMING IN ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY

Authors

  • Abduvahobova Gulsanam Abduvohid qizi Student of the 2nd year, Group 39, Department of Organic Product Storage and Processing, Andijan Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnologies Author
  • Mirolimova Malikaxon Farxodjon qizi Student of the 2nd year, Group 39, Department of Organic Product Storage and Processing, Andijan Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnologies Author
  • Saydullayev Alisher Fayzullo o‘g‘li Assistant, Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Andijan Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnologies Author

Keywords:

organic livestock farming, greenhouse gas emissions, soil fertility, biodiversity, agroecosystem, climate change, sustainable development, efficient resource use

Abstract

This article analyzes the environmental impact of conventional and organic livestock farming systems within the context of modern global ecological challenges, their contribution to climate change, and their role in ensuring agroecosystem sustainability. Organic livestock farming, based on natural resource cycling, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, enhances soil fertility, and promotes biodiversity. This approach enables farmers to use resources efficiently and develop sustainable growth strategies. The article emphasizes the importance of developing organic livestock farming from ecological, economic, and social perspectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

FAO. Environment and Natural Resources Series No.4 – Organic agriculture and the environment. Rome: FAO, 2007. 56 p.

Lin X., et al. Environmental Impact of Organic Agriculture // Advances in Agronomy. 2016. Vol. 139. P. 1–64.

Gerber P.J., et al. Climate Change and Livestock Production: A Literature Review // Atmosphere. 2022. Vol. 13, № 3. Article 310. DOI: 10.3390/atmos13030310.

Ponisio L.C., et al. Benefits of organic over conventional agriculture // Science. 2015. Vol. 351, № 6271. P. 1190–1192.

Saydullayev A. F. ORGANIK MOL GO ‘SHTI ISHLAB CHIQARISHDA MINERAL QO ‘SHIMCHALARNING SAMARADORLIGI //Экономика и социум. – 2025. – №. 4-1 (131). – С. 520-523.

Smith P., et al. Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming // PNAS. 2013. Vol. 110, № 40. P. 16526–16531.

Kirchmann H., et al. Comparison of long-term organic and conventional crop–livestock systems // Agronomy Journal. 2007. Vol. 99, № 4. P. 960–972.

Tuomisto H.L., et al. Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts? – A meta-analysis of European research // Journal of Environmental Management. 2012. Vol. 112. P. 309–320.

IntechOpen. Organic Agriculture: Global Challenges and Environmental Impacts. London: IntechOpen, 2023. 120 p.

Cambridge Core. Organic agriculture and climate change // Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2021. Vol. 36, № 1. P. 1–14.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 41 (2025): FORMATION OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PEDAGOGY AS INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

Section

Articles