CATEGORIAL FEATURES OF PREDICATES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
Abstract
In the analytical forms of the auxiliary verb, the resultant and the main predicate in a certain sense lose their lexical meaning and express two types of action. In this case, one action is evaluated as the result of another. For example: Your poor father bent his back; now you do not burn (Said Ahmad, 255).
Downloads
References
Васильев Л.М. Форма и содержание языка как знаковой системы // Вестник ВЭГУ : педагогика. Уфа, 1996, 3 : 39-42.
Problemy funktsional'noi grammatiki. Polevye struktury.Russian Edition | by Ed. by A.V. Bondarko et al | Jan 1, 2005
Brosig B. Depictives and resultatives in modern khalkh Mongolian // Hokkaidō
Gengo bunka kenkyū.2009. No. 7.–P. 71–101.
Bybee J. L., R. Perkins, W. Pagliuca.Theevolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages ofthe world. –Chicago: The U. of Chicago Press, 1994. Carrier J., RandallJ.H., The Argument Structure and Syntactic Structure of Resultatives //Linguistic Inquiry 23, 1992. –Р. 173-234.
Goldberg A.Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. L. – Chicago: The University of ChicagoPress, 1995. –265 p.Davlatova, M. H. Relation of lexical-semantic structure of verbs in the linguistic essence. IEJRD-International Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(5).
Ризаев Б. Х. К проблеме лимитативно нейтральных глаголов современного немецкого языка. // Лингвистические исследования: Аспекты грамматического анализа. – М., 1990. – С. 131-140.
Сайфуллаева Р. Р., Менглиев Б.Р., Боқиева Г.Ҳ., Қурбонова М.М., Юнусова З. Ҳ., Абузалова М. Қ. Ҳозирги ўзбек адабий тили. – Т.: Фан ва технология, 2010. – 404 б.
Сафаров Ш. Прагмалингвистика. – Т.: «Ўзбекистон миллий энциклопедияси», 2008. – 286 б.
